Stephen Stewart memorial pool match

If you've been following this site for a while then you'll know that I'm usually quite slow and methodical in the way that I light photos. Yesterday I had to do a photo as quickly as possible as we were doing it at the beginning of a pool match and we were using one of the two pool tables!

Stephen's mum and sisters

I'd already done one picture that the paper could use, a group shot of all the competitors, so to some extent the pressure was off. But I wanted to do this photo and I wanted to light it properly so we gave it a go. The three women were the mother and sisters of Stephen Stewart, a young soldier who died of cancer. The pool match is held annually in his memory and raises money for the Highland Hospice.
I quickly set-up one flash into a silver brolly as the main light and another bare flash as a hair light. Guessed the settings. Put the women into position, did one test shot of the back of their heads to check the hair light, and turned it down a notch. Did another test shot of their faces and the main light looked okay. Rattled off a couple of dozen shots and we were done.

From set-up to pull-down it took about seven minutes. I could nitpick the photo to pieces, and some of those nitpicks would be major ones, but the bottom line is that it's an okay picture and we did it in a busy pub without causing too much disturbance. I hope the paper runs this instead of the group shot!

Estate agent interiors

Over the last couple of weeks I've spent many, many, many hours along at a friend's holiday home, taking pictures of the interiors for her estate agent's web site. I've occasionally tried doing interior photos of my own house without much success, so when I was asked to photograph the holiday home I wasn't confident that I'd produce anything decent. Rather than turn away work I decided to do the job and take as long as necessary, but only charge a fair rate of one-hour per finished photo.

The first time I went along there, I spent a couple of hours photographing the living room and then maybe half an hour in each of the other rooms. Came home, looked at the photos on the computer, and they were dreadful. The rooms looked cold and uninviting. I showed them to a friend who does a lot of architectural photos and he cut straight to the heart of the problem: The photos shouldn't just show the rooms, they should sell them to potential occupants. I'd been obsessing over angles and 'correct' exposures, and trying to show the entire room.

(Classic rookie mistake: "I've got a wide lens, I'll shoot wide!" Duh. Yes the photos needed a wide lens, but they needed to be wide for a reason, not just to crowbar everything into the frame.)

When I went back later that afternoon I concentrated on doing just the living room, and I took my laptop with me so I could check the pictures at a decent size and fine-tune them. I also lit the photos, using a combination of ambient and off-camera flash. After another couple of hours, here's what I came up with to show the living room. Notice that there's a flash behind the television to create a focal point. I also had another flash up high to right of frame, putting some trim around the edges of the grey furniture, to give them some separation.

Living room
With hindsight I can see that the living room photo could be improved, but I was very happy with it at the time. And despite the faults that I can see now, I still think I did a good job.

Next up was the kitchen. The mistake I originally made with the kitchen was trying to show too much of it. It's quite a large and spacious kitchen with a fireplace and lots of work surfaces, so I thought it was important to show those features as a selling point. But eventually I decided to just show the "living" part of the kitchen: The breakfast bar with a sea view, and the hob/oven. To keep the image very clean I cleared everything off the surfaces apart from a kettle on the hob and a vase of flowers that I borrowed from a neighbour. In the end I thought that even the flowers were too much so I did the picture with just the kettle. There was one flash to left of frame lighting the whole room, and another flash under the breakfast bar to lift the shadows that otherwise made the room appear too cold.

Kitchen

And then the bedroom. I have never enjoyed doing a photo LESS than doing this bedroom! I must have stopped half a dozen times and said to myself, out loud: "Andy, you do NOT know how to do this." Everything I tried looked awful. Several times I nearly gave up and walked away.

Well to cut a long story short, I eventually realised that I'd been making exactly the same mistake that I originally made with the kitchen: Trying to show the whole room. That was producing photos with a lot of floor (ie: dead space) and the end of the bed filling the middle of the frame. By simply moving over to near the bed and forgetting about 1/4 of the room that was just door and floor, I was able to quickly find an attractive angle. Took about an hour to light it properly, using one flash behind me to flood the room and another flash behind the bedside table to create a focal point. The picture hanging on the wall had a lot of reflections from the window and the lights so I photographed and processed it separately, then superimposed it. I removed the dark bed sheets and left just the white pillows and duvet to keep everything bright and breezy.

Bedroom
And finally we needed an exterior shot. During several visits to the house I tried various 'clever' ideas, none of which worked, and before I knew it I was two hours away from having to hand over the finished photos and I didn't have a decent exterior. In desperation I ended up looking back through a set of test shots I'd done weeks earlier and one shot jumped out at me, so I processed that and I think it's about the best I could hope for.

Exterior

So now Eastlea Cottage in the Seaboard Villages on the north-east coast of Scotland has a nice set of professional photos on its web site.

And despite the fact that I didn't enjoy doing this job at all, at least I now know that I can do good interior photos so that's another box ticked and another client base that I can accept work from. It would be great if every job could be easy and fun, but the reality, for me, is that photography is work, not a hobby, and I don't like saying no to work, even the really difficult jobs!

Cruise ship entertainers

The thing I love most about this job, and I think most photographers would agree with me, is that you get to go places and do things that you'd never normally be allowed to do. Today I had great fun going on board the cruise ship Arielle during her visit to Invergordon.

Cruise ship entertainers
Originally the plan was to get a photo of all the local musicians and dancers who went on board to entertain the passengers. Above the stage there were hundreds of little orange lights hanging down and I thought they would make a great "showbiz" background, but only for a small group. I decided to do the picture with the three youngsters: Two dancers and a piper.

I had to take the picture from a low angle to get the lights in the background, which meant holding my flash up as high as I could to distribute the light evenly across the three subjects.

Technically everything came together very well. Artistically I think the composition could have been better. But as I've said before, I think it's important to always push ahead and try something a bit different. I'm more satisfied with this picture than I would have been with an easy shot that was better executed.

Keep in mind that we were doing this photo at the front of the stage with a theatre full of several hundred passengers!

Balintore vs Maitlands Bar

Congratulations to Balintore who beat Maitlands Bar from Tain tonight in what could be described as a decisive 15-0 victory. I sorted out a few pics in the hope that they'll make it into the Ross-shire Journal but I suspect they'll be too late for this week's issue. Here they are anyway…

Balintore vs Maitlands Bar

Balintore vs Ross-shire Club

Here are some action photos from Saturday's game between Balintore and Ross-shire Club. I'll hold off on posting the team photos until the paper's had chance to use them. (North Star if you're looking out for them.)

For this game, and the Ross County vs Gretna game, I used a 1.4x teleconverter on my 300mm lens to get a total of 420mm, and I'm finding that I get better pictures at this focal length. It does mean that I have to work at f/4 which is fine for the daytime summer games, but once winter rolls around again I'm going to finally want that 400mm f/2.8 lens that I've been telling myself I don't need. Cringe.

By the way there's a bigger version of the netcam shot on my Sports Shooter page if you want to see it. (Click here!) Hopefully it will be in this week's Ross-shire Journal but I won't know until I see it myself on Friday.

Balintore vs Ross-shire Club

In-the-goal netcam shot

I've mentioned before that the one killer football shot I'm still waiting to get is a netcam shot of a goal with the camera actually inside the goal. I don't think I'm ready to cross it off the list just yet, but I got close today.

In-the-goal netcam shot
This isn't a brilliant shot but it does have a few things going for it, especially the way the penalty-taker is framed by the goalie. Hopefully, if nothing else, it will help to raise the bar of what the local papers demand of their sports shooters. Nobody else around here is trying anything like this, and they really should be.

After considering the various clamps and protective case options, I'd decided that the only safe way to do this shot was to lie down at the side of the goal and poke the lens through the net, then get the hell out of the way if either the ball or the goalie came in my direction. So that's exactly what I did. Got the shot, nobody got hurt, no gear broken. Result!

Soroptimist cheque presentation

This is one of those situations when all you can do is shake your head in bewilderment. We spent about 15 minutes getting this group shot set-up and lit correctly, and then the paper went and cropped it badly. Here's how I shot it. I have no idea why the paper cropped out the woman on the left, which had the knock-on effect of making the whole picture appear lopsided.

Soroptomist cheque presentation

High key family portrait

This was a birthday present for a friend, a portrait of her children. She knew I'd be doing a picture for her but she'd guessed that it would be just her younger son, so it was still a bit of a surprise. Even got a few tears out of her. Job done!

High key family portrait

Gretna up, County down

Commiserations to Ross County on dropping to the Second Division, but congratulations to Gretna on promotion to the Scottish Premier League after a nail-biting 3-2 victory at Victoria Park.

Gretna celebration

The company I was doing the photos for today was only interested in Ross County players so I mostly stayed out of the way after the match. The other photographers needed the Gretna celebration pics for whatever papers or agencies they were working for, so I didn't want to make their jobs any more difficult by diving into the scrum. Instead I took the opportunity to see if I could get any decent pics by shooting from off to one side, or from down low, up high, etc. I really like the one shown above. Don't know why, it just works for me.

Reproducing and restoring old photos

Restoring old photos isn't particularly difficult. It can take hours and hours and hours of intricate work but if you're competent with Photoshop then you can soon figure out how to repair all the rips, stains and blemishes.

But reproducing and restoring these old photos presented three quite different challenges: Firstly, they were behind glass and they couldn't be removed from the frames. Secondly, the print of the man was warped. Thirdly, the picture of the man was slightly out-of-focus.

Reproducing and restoring old photos

The easy part of the job was that the prints were large and good quality. This made it a lot easier to get them onto the computer, which I did by photographing them with a 1Ds and a 24-70 f/2.8L lens at 50mm. You reproduce artwork at 50mm because it's the approximate focal length of the human eye. I stopped the lens down a touch to avoid any loss of quality from shooting wide open.

But how do you photograph a print through glass without reflections?

It's simple with hindsight but it took me a little while to figure it out. I propped the picture up on a chair and set-up a flash slightly in front of it but way up high and right over at the other side of the room. I angled the flash straight at the front of the frame. The idea was to have the light hitting the glass at a very sharp angle, and from far away to minimise fall-off across the surface of the print. Test shots revealed that the frame was casting a shadow onto the picture so I moved the flash forward until the shadow stopped being a problem. With a single light source coming from a known angle it was then a simple matter of taking the photo with a polarizer to cancel out any reflections. I also knew the temperature of the flash so I could get the white balance perfect, which is necessary for reproducing sepia-toned pictures even when they'll be converted to black & white.

That was the photo of the woman done. But as the photo of the man was warped, the paper was actually casting shadows onto itself! I eventually solved that problem by bringing the flash over to right in front of the picture, up high, angled straight down. The frame was lying on its side and the light was going along the ripples in the paper. This was an amazingly effective solution and I didn't need to spend a single second in processing to fix the warping. Neat, eh?

It was fairly simple from then on. Each picture took about 4 hours of work to remove all of the blemishes, which involved several thousand manual edits right down to the pixel level. The fading of the prints, and shooting through glass, required multiple tone curves to put a bit of contrast back into the pictures. And the picture of the man took another hour or so to fix the focus, or at least to force it as much as I could using multiple USM passes of decreasing radius.

The finished pictures were printed around 11"x17" on fine-art paper and they looked great. Throughout the processing I had made a point of NOT comparing them to the original prints, but when I finally did compare them I was more than satisfied that I'd done the job right.